SANTA CLARA COUNTY (KRON) — Closing arguments in the penalty phase of the Sierra LaMar trial are being presented Tuesday morning.
The jury will have to decide whether Antolin Garcia-Torres will be put to death or spend the rest of his life behind bars after he was convicted of killing Sierra LaMar.
Garcia-Torres, 26, was found guilty May 9 of the first-degree murder of the 15-year-old in 2012 and of the attempted kidnappings of three women in two dark Morgan Hill Safeway parking lots in 2009.
Prosecutor David Boyd emphasized justice in his emotional plea for jurors to exercise the maximum penalty on Garcia-Torres, whose mother, a Mexican immigrant who speaks no English, walked out of the courtroom toward the end of Boyd’s argument.
“What penalty does justice require? What penalty does the evidence in this case compel? What penalty is the only moral and just punishment for the defendant’s crimes?” Boyd asked.
In urging jurors to unanimously vote for the death penalty, Boyd reminded them not to allow Sierra, whose body has never been found, to become an abstraction or to misattribute compassion toward Garcia-Torres.
“The easy path would be to select life without the possibility of parole,” Boyd said. “It takes courage to look at this defendant, a man, flesh and blood, and determine what is the just punishment for what he has done.”
The fact that Sierra’s body has never been found should not be cause for lingering doubt of the defendant’s guilt, Boyd said. He argued that the fact that Garcia-Torres murdered the girl and hid her body showed a lack of remorse that should be punished.
“He could have let her go. He could have relied on anonymity. He made that choice, the next choice. He could have relied on threats to keep her quiet,” Boyd said. “At each and every stage where the defendant could have stopped, he chose not to.”
Last week, the jury heard testimony from Garcia-Torres’ family members about the poverty, incest and abuse present in their ramshackle homes in San Martin and Morgan Hill.
But in his argument Tuesday morning, Boyd pointed out that the defendant was not aware of the years of sexual abuse that his father, who is serving a life sentence for those crimes, inflicted on a young female
relative while Garcia-Torres was a child.
And while Garcia-Torres’ mother Laura Torres testified that her alcoholic ex-husband was also physically and emotionally abusive of her, Boyd said the jury had not been presented any evidence to suggest that the
defendant had been abused at home.
“He had family who cared about him around him,” Boyd said.
As for the fact that Garcia-Torres grew up in poverty, Boyd asked, “Are we not taking away the moral agency of every other person who’s experienced poverty and farm life in this world if we say ‘No, no, you get
the lesser punishment for this monstrous, death penalty-eligible crime?'”
A medical toxicologist testified last week that Garcia-Torres was exposed to pesticides while growing up in a shack in the middle of the San Martin strawberry fields where his parents picked fruit.
But of the Florida-based toxicologist, Boyd said, “He has no evidence whatsoever that this defendant suffered any harmful effects. None.”
Last week, jurors saw photos of a young Garcia-Torres smiling and goofing around with his ex-girlfriend and their two daughters, the younger of whom was born after his arrest on May 21, 2012.
Torres testified through an interpreter last week that she always brought Garcia-Torres’ daughters to visit him at San Jose’s Main Jail and that the two looked forward to their weekly phone calls with him.
But Boyd argued that Garcia-Torres’ role as a father is overshadowed by the enormity of his crimes, balking at the notion that “he deserves the lesser punishment because he could procreate.”
Boyd urged the jury repeatedly to not spare Garcia-Torres the fate that he inflicted on Sierra, asking why mercy and compassion should be exercised on a murderer who did not show the same to his victim.
“There is not much worse than the murder of a child,” Boyd said. “She saw the true face of evil, and he was touching her naked body.”
Boyd was set to continue his closing argument Tuesday afternoon.
KRON4’s Rob Fladeboe is in the courtroom providing live updates:
Jury sees pic of 5 yr old Antolin w/starbursts that read poverty, violence, pesticides, neglect. “He grew up with no role models.” pic.twitter.com/DhWs382rYu
— @Rob Fladeboe kron4 (@KRON4RFladeboe) May 30, 2017
Def. making case for jury that Garcia Torres’ early life was a nightmare. Asserts life in prison w/out parole is punishment that never ends pic.twitter.com/61n7sz9xge
— @Rob Fladeboe kron4 (@KRON4RFladeboe) May 30, 2017
#AntolinGarciaTorres: crisp blue shirt and tie today. Mother here. Occasional glance toward jury. Atty to jury: “His life is in your hands.” pic.twitter.com/YbGQ2gGzSl
— @Rob Fladeboe kron4 (@KRON4RFladeboe) May 30, 2017
Defense asserts to jury evidence suggests room for “lingering doubt.” Says sentence of life in prison means #GarciaTorres will die in prison pic.twitter.com/5jBZUInxYw
— @Rob Fladeboe kron4 (@KRON4RFladeboe) May 30, 2017
Defense: Poverty, alcoholic father and exposure to violence are all “mitigating factors” that can justify sentence of life in prison. pic.twitter.com/mvmF044bIa
— @Rob Fladeboe kron4 (@KRON4RFladeboe) May 30, 2017
Defense reviewing jury instructions. Reminds jury that “mitigating factors,” i.e. GarciaTorres’ upbringing, do not have to explain crime pic.twitter.com/WzSnD3PPLq
— @Rob Fladeboe kron4 (@KRON4RFladeboe) May 30, 2017
#AntolinGarciaTorres atty Brian Matthews addressing jury now. Reminds jury it acts as group but decision is based on individual opinions pic.twitter.com/bfYZHwwh3J
— @Rob Fladeboe kron4 (@KRON4RFladeboe) May 30, 2017
Pros concludes closing args w/video of Sierra. Last words to jury. “What is a fit and moral and just punishment for murder of #SierraLaMar?” pic.twitter.com/RLl1MUYLle
— @Rob Fladeboe kron4 (@KRON4RFladeboe) May 30, 2017
Dep DA David Boyd describes “wreckage” of defendants actions. Again poses question. “What punishment does justice deserve?” pic.twitter.com/lKUSPeqHaN
— @Rob Fladeboe kron4 (@KRON4RFladeboe) May 30, 2017
#SierraLaMar trial. Closing arguments resume. Jury see’s video clip of last time classmates may have seen her alive. pic.twitter.com/JigxtD1Q1d
— @Rob Fladeboe kron4 (@KRON4RFladeboe) May 30, 2017
DA invokes Memorial Day sentiment Compare’s jury’s penalty deliberations in #SierraLaMar case to that of ‘soldier on eve of battle.” pic.twitter.com/zCupa6Lsgv
— @Rob Fladeboe kron4 (@KRON4RFladeboe) May 30, 2017
#GarciaTorres background of poverty no excuse for lesser punishment. Does not deserve sympathy, compassion or mercy, says DA. pic.twitter.com/qcJR7JmXYG
— @Rob Fladeboe kron4 (@KRON4RFladeboe) May 30, 2017
DA Boyd. #GarciaTorres “learned” from attacks on 3 other women before #Sierra‘s murder. His age (21 then) is not mitigating factor. pic.twitter.com/HsIsF3kFyD
— @Rob Fladeboe kron4 (@KRON4RFladeboe) May 30, 2017
(2) “…unless it illuminates some positive quality of the defendant’s background or character.” DA again. Sympathy not a mitigating factor pic.twitter.com/ldGvQ1RAZL
— @Rob Fladeboe kron4 (@KRON4RFladeboe) May 30, 2017
Jury remind that law says “evidence, if any, of the impact of an execution on family members should be disregarded unless it…… pic.twitter.com/epBmF5BzYV
— @Rob Fladeboe kron4 (@KRON4RFladeboe) May 30, 2017
DA to jury. Sympathy is not a mitigating factor in deciding whether to impose death penalty or life in prison without parole. pic.twitter.com/tYczNTK3yd
— @Rob Fladeboe kron4 (@KRON4RFladeboe) May 30, 2017
#AntolinGarciaTorres penalty phase. Closing arguments by pros. resume after recess. pic.twitter.com/JKNcF0oUq0
— @Rob Fladeboe kron4 (@KRON4RFladeboe) May 30, 2017
Judge interrupts DA’s closing args, momentum, calls recess amid discussions(away from jury) about def. objections. pic.twitter.com/m7HZ0JPDy5
— @Rob Fladeboe kron4 (@KRON4RFladeboe) May 30, 2017
DA reads law to jury. Explains that death sentence means aggravating circumstances must outweigh mitigating circumstances. pic.twitter.com/QjYM3AA7X8
— @Rob Fladeboe kron4 (@KRON4RFladeboe) May 30, 2017
DA, anticipating defense arguments, urges jury not to show compassion or mercy to defendant. “He showed none of those things to Sierra.” pic.twitter.com/PxkDddfLsW
— @Rob Fladeboe kron4 (@KRON4RFladeboe) May 30, 2017
“Think about what the defendant did and how he did it.” Jury urged by prosecution to impose “maximum” punishment. pic.twitter.com/T0OZgC0InE
— @Rob Fladeboe kron4 (@KRON4RFladeboe) May 30, 2017
Life without parole would be easy option for jury. But justice demands punishment to match “monstrous” crimes. DA asks jury to show courage. pic.twitter.com/WDnInaswCz
— @Rob Fladeboe kron4 (@KRON4RFladeboe) May 30, 2017
Jury again hears frantic 911 call from Marlene LaMar on day Sierra vanished. DA says she endured “unspeakable” acts. pic.twitter.com/wSe6BPC3Bm
— @Rob Fladeboe kron4 (@KRON4RFladeboe) May 30, 2017
#SierraLaMar trial. “What is the one penalty required by justice in this case,” asks DA? Evidence points to one verdict. “Death” pic.twitter.com/xSckowMUAe
— @Rob Fladeboe kron4 (@KRON4RFladeboe) May 30, 2017
Closing arguments begin. Dep. DA David Boyd first. SCC Sheriff Laurie Smith in courtroom. pic.twitter.com/Js13AW0i5N
— @Rob Fladeboe kron4 (@KRON4RFladeboe) May 30, 2017
Courtroom 2/3 full. #AntolinGarciaTorres family, #SteveLamar present. As always, defendant stands, faces jury as they enter. pic.twitter.com/IRlFEP69os
— @Rob Fladeboe kron4 (@KRON4RFladeboe) May 30, 2017
On the record. Judge Vanessa A. Zecher reviewing jury instructions. “You must decide what the facts are.” pic.twitter.com/j3Pnp1ns3P
— @Rob Fladeboe kron4 (@KRON4RFladeboe) May 30, 2017
Back in court for #SierraLaMar trial. Jury not yet seated. Ground rules discussed before closing arguments begin in trial’s penalty phase pic.twitter.com/TGbj6FWln4
— @Rob Fladeboe kron4 (@KRON4RFladeboe) May 30, 2017